تولیدات دامی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

اثرات افزودن سطوح مختلف سین‌بیوتیک بومی ایرانی به آب آشامیدنی بر عملکرد، خصوصیات لاشه و جمعیت میکروبی روده کوچک جوجه‌های گوشتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم دامی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران

2 استادیار، موسسه تحقیقات علوم دامی، کرج، ایران.

3 دانش آموخته دکتری، مدیر علمی و فنی شرکت زیست تخمیر ماهان، تهران، ایران

4 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

چکیده

این مطالعه به‌منظور ارزیابی اثرات افزودن سطوح مختلف سین­بیوتیک تولید داخل به آب آشامیدنی بر صفات تولیدی، خصوصیات لاشه و جمعیت میکروبی روده کوچک جوجه­های گوشتی انجام شد. تعداد 400 قطعه جوجه گوشتییک‌روزهراس 308(مخلوط دو جنس با نسبت مساوی) در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با چهار تیمار، پنج تکرار و 20 قطعه جوجه در هر تکرار مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. تیمارهای آزمایشی شامل افزودن سطوح صفر (شاهد)، 50، 100 و 150 گرم سین­بیوتیک (بیوپول) به هر هزار لیتر آب آشامیدنی بود. در سن 42 روزگی، افزودن 50 یا 100 گرم سین­بیوتیک به هر هزار لیتر آب آشامیدنی سبب کاهش معنی­دار ضریب تبدیل در مقایسه با سایر گرو­ه­های آزمایشی شد (0/05>P). افزایش شاخص تولید در گروه دریافت­کننده 100 گرم بیوپول در مقایسه با شاهد، تمایل به معنی­داری نشان داد (0/08=P). بیوپول در سطوح 100 و 150 گرم سبب افزایش تعداد کل لاکتوباسیلوس­ها و کاهش شمار مخمر و کپک، کلی‌فرم­ها و کل باکتری­های گرم منفی ایلئوم در مقایسه با شاهد شد (0/05>P). براساس نتایج به‌دست‌آمده، استفاده از سطح 100 گرم سین­بیوتیک بیوپول در 1000 لیتر آب آشامیدنی جوجه­های گوشتی می­تواند ضمن کمک به تعادل جمعیت میکروبی روده کوچک سبب بهبود شاخص تولید شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effects of adding different levels of Iranian native synbiotic to drinking water on performance, carcass characteristics and small intestinal microbial population of broiler chickens

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir Hossein Alizadeh-Ghamsari 1
  • sayed abdoullah hosseini 2
  • Hamidreza Khoshkerdar 3
  • Mohammadreza Soleymani Damaneh 4

1 Assisstant Professor, Animal Science Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran

2 Animal Sceince Reaserch Institute

3 Scientific and technical director of Zist-Takhmir-Mahan Company, Tehran, Iran

4 Graduated M.S. student, College of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of adding different levels of a domestically produced synbiotic to drinking water on production traits, carcass characteristics and the small intestinal microbial population of broiler chickens. Four hundred one-day-old Ross 308 broilers (a mixture of two sexes with equal proportion) were used in a completely randomized design with 4 treatments, 5 replicates, and of 20 birds per each replicate. Experimental treatments included adding levels: zero (control), 50, 100 and 150 g of synbiotic (Biopoul) per 1000 liters of drinking water. At 42 days of age, the addition of 50 or 100 g of synbiotic per 1000 liters of drinking water significantly decreased feed conversion ratio (P < 0.05). The increase of production index in the group receiving 100 g of Biopoul compared to the control showed a tendency (P = 0.08). Biopoul in the levels of 50, 100 and 150 g increased the total number of lactobacilli and decreased the number of yeasts and molds, coliforms and total gram-negative bacteria in the ileum compared to the control (P<0.05). According to the obtained results, the use of 100 g of synbiotic Biopoul per 1000 liters of drinking water of broiler chickens can improve the production index while helping to balance the small intestinal microbial population. 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Broiler
  • Carcass characteristics
  • Ileal microbial population
  • Performance
  • Synbiotic
مراجع
  1. Abd El-Hack ME, El-Saadony MT, Shafi ME, Qattan SYA, Batiha GE, Khafaga AF, Abdel-Moneim AE and Alagawany M (2020) Probiotics in Poultry feed: a comprehensive review. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 104(6): 1835-1850.
  2. Abdel-Hafeez HM, Saleh E, Tawfeek SS, Youssef I and Abdel-Daim A (2017) Effects of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic with and without feed restriction on performance, hematological indices and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 30(5): 672-682.
  3. Aziz Mousavi SMA, Seidavi AR, Dadashbeiki M, Kilonzo-Nthenge A, Nahashon SN, Laudadio V and Tufarelli V (2015) Effect of a synbiotic (Biomin®IMBO) on growth performance traits of broiler chickens. European Poultry Science, 79: 1-15.
  4. Cecek AA and Binek M (2014) Chicken intestinal microbiota function with a special emphasis on the role of probiotic bacteria. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 17(2): 385-394.
  5. Dunislawska A, Slawinska A, Stadnicka K, Bednarczyk M, Gulewicz P, Jozefiak D and Siwek M (2017) Synbiotics for broiler chickens- in vitro design and evaluation of the influence on host and selected microbiota populations following in ovo delivery. PLOS ONE, 12(1): e0168587. [online] Available at  https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168587 (accessed2 September 2021). 
  6. Engberg RM, Hedemann MS, Steenfeldt S and Jensen BB (2004) Influence of whole wheat and xylanase on broiler performance and microbial composition and activity in the digestive tract. Poultry Science, 83(6): 925-938.
  7. Froebel LK, Jalukar S, Lavergne TA, Lee JT and Duong T (2019) Administration of dietary prebiotics improves growth performance and reduces pathogen colonization in broiler chickens, Poultry Science, 98(12): 6668-6676.
  8. Graham BD, Selby CM, Teague KD, Graham LE, Vuong CN, Latorre JD, Tellez G and Hargis BM (2019) Development of a novel in ovo challenge model for virulent Escherichia coli strains. Poultry Science, 98(11): 5330-5335.
  9. Khalaji S, Zaghari M, Hatami KH, Hedari-Dastjerdi S, Lotfi L and Nazarian H (2011) Black cumin seeds, Artemisia leaves (Artemisia sieberi), and Camellia L. plant extract as phytogenic products in broiler diets and their effects on performance, blood constituents, immunity, and cecal microbial population. Poultry Science, 90(11): 2500-2510.
  10. Li Z, Wang W, Liu D and Guo Y (2018). Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus on the growth performance and intestinal health of broilers challenged with Clostridium perfringens. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 9: 25. [online]. Available at  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5870167/ (accessed1 September 2021).
  11. Marcu A, Vacaru-Opriş I, Dumitrescu G, Petculescu Ciochină L, Marcu A, Nicula M, Peţ I, Dronca D, Kelciov B, and Mariş C (2013) The influence of genetics on economic efficiency of broiler chickens growth. Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 46(2): 339-346.

 

 

 

 

  1. Mountzouris KC, Tsitrsikos P, Palamidi I, Arvaniti A, Mohnl M, Schatzmayr G and Fegeros K (2010) Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins, and cecal microflora composition. Poultry Science, 89(1): 58-67.
  2. Nisar H, Sharif M, Rahman MA, Rehman S, Kamboh AAand Saeed M. 2021. Effects of dietary supplementations of synbiotics on growth performance, carcass characteristics and nutrient digestibility of broiler chicken. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 23(2): 1-10.
  3. Nosrati M, Javandel F, Camacho LM, Khusro A, Cipriano M, Seidavi A and Salem AZM (2017) The effects of antibiotic, probiotic, organic acid, vitamin C, and Echinacea purpurea extract on performance, carcass characteristics, blood chemistry, microbiota, and immunity of broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 26(2): 295-306.
  4. Pourakbari M, Seidavi A, Asadpour L and Martínez A (2016) Probiotic level effects on growth performance, carcass traits, blood parameters, cecal microbiota, and immune response of broilers. Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences, 88(2): 1011-1021.
  5. Rehman A, Arif M, Sajjad N, Al-Ghadi MQ, Alagawany M, Abd El-Hack ME, Alhimaidi AR, Elnesr SS, Almutairi BO, Amran RA, Hussein EOS and Swelum AA (2020) Dietary effect of probiotics and prebiotics on broiler performance, carcass, and immunity. Poultry Science, 99(12): 6946-6953.
  6. Ricke SC, Lee SI, Kim SA, Park SH and Shi Z (2020) Prebiotics and the poultry gastrointestinal tract microbiome. Poultry Science, 99(2): 670-677.
  7. Santos FSDL, Farnell MB, Tellez G, Balog JM, Anthony NB, Torres-Rodriguez A, Higgins S, Hargis BM, Donoghue AM (2005) Effect of prebiotic on gut development and ascites incidence of broilers reared in a hypoxic environment, Poultry Science, 84(7): 1092-1100.
  8. Sarangi NR, Babu LK, Kumar A, Pradhan CR, Pati PK and Mishra JP (2016) Effect of dietary supplementation of prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic on growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Veterinary world, 9(3): 313-319.
  9. Seidavi A, Dadashbeiki M, Alimohammadi-Saraei MH, van den Hoven R, Payan-Carreira R, Laudadio V and Tufarelli V (2017) Effects of dietary inclusion level of a mixture of probiotic cultures and enzymes on broiler chickens immunity response. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(5): 4637-4644.
  10. Slawinska A, Siwek M, Zylinska J, Bardowski J, Brzezinska J, Gulewicz KA, Nowak M, Urbanowski M, Plowiec A and Bednarczyk M (2014) Influence of synbiotics delivered in ovo on immune organ development and structure. Folia Biologica (Kraków), 62(3): 277-285.
  11. Śliżewska K, Markowiak-Kopeć P, Żbikowski A and Szeleszczuk P (2020) The effect of synbiotic preparations on the intestinal microbiota and her metabolism in broiler chickens. Scientific Reports, 10: 4281. [online]. Available at  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-61256-z.pdf (accessed12 August 2021).
  12. Yadav S and Jha R (2019) Strategies to modulate the intestinal microbiota and their effects on nutrient utilization, performance, and health of poultry. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 10: 2. [online]. Available at  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332572/pdf/40104_2018_Article_310.pdf (accessed16 July 2021).
  13. Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhan X, Zeng X, Zhou L, Cao G, Chen A and Yang C (2016) Effects of dietary supplementation of probiotic, Clostridium butyricum, on growth performance, immune response, intestinal barrier function, and digestive enzyme activity in broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli K88. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 7: 3. [online]. Available at  https://jasbsci.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s40104-016-0061-4.pdf (accessed24 April 2021).

 

 

تولیدات دامی
دوره 24، شماره 2
تیر 1401
صفحه 177-187
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار