نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار بخش تحقیقات علوم دامی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی زنجان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، زنجان، ایران.

2 دانش‌آموخته دکتری، گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران.

3 استاد، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم دامی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج ایران.

چکیده

اثر استفاده از پروبیوتیک بیوپلاس B2 و پری‌بیوتیک گالاکتوالیگوساکارید بر عملکرد، کیفیت تخم‌مرغ تولیدی و برخی فراسنجه‌های خونی مرغان تخم‌گذار تجاری، با استفاده از 216 قطعه مرغ‌ تخم‌گذار های‌لاین (w36) با میانگین وزنی مشابه از سن 50 تا 62 هفتگی به‌مدت 12 هفته در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی در سیستم قفس با شش تیمار و شش تکرار و شش قطعه مرغ در هر تکرار بررسی شد. تیمارهای آزمایشی شامل 1- بدون افزودنی (شاهد)، 2- جیره حاوی 0/1 درصد پروبیوتیک بیوپلاس B2، 3 تا 6- به‌ترتیب جیره‌های حاوی 0/05، 0/1، 0/15 و 0/2 درصد پری‌بیوتیک گالاکتوالیگوساکارید بودند. نتایج نشان داد که وزن و توده تخم‌مرغ تولیدی در جیره حاوی پروبیوتیک بیوپلاس B2 افزایش معنی‌دار داشت (0/05>P). درصد تولید تخم‌مرغ، خوراک مصرفی و ضریب تبدیل غذایی تحت تأثیر تیمارهای آزمایشی قرار نگرفت. استفاده از گالاکتوالیگوساکارید در سطوح 0/05، 0/1 و 0/2 درصد منجر به بهبود وزن پوسته خشک و سطوح 0/05، 0/15 و 0/2 درصد منجر به افزایش وزن واحد سطح پوسته در مقایسه با گروه شاهد شد (0/05>P). پروتئین کل و آلبومین سرم در تیمار پروبیوتیک بیوپلاس B2 افزایش نشان داد (0/05>P). سطح کلسترول خون در تیمار پروبیوتیک بیوپلاس B2 و 0/15 درصد گالاکتوالیگوساکارید به‌طور معنی‌دار کاهش یافت (0/05>P). به‌طورکلی نتایج نشان داد که استفاده از پری‌بیوتیک گالاکتوالیگوساکارید به میزان 0/15 درصد ضمن بهبود برخی صفات عملکردی منجر به بهبود معنی‌دار وزن واحد سطح پوسته تخم‌مرغ و کاهش سطح کلسترول سرم خون در مقایسه با گروه شاهد شد و می‌تواند جایگزین پروبیوتیک بیوپلاس B2 شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of the effect of Bioplus B2 probiotic and galacto oligosaccharide prebiotic on performance, egg quality and some blood parameters of commercial laying hens

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Hossein nemati 1
  • Mustafa Hajilou 2
  • sayed abdoullah hosseini 3
  • seyyed saeid mousavi 1

1 Assistant Professor, Animal Science Research Department, Zanjan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Zanjan- Iran

2 PhD in Animal Science

3 Animal Sceince Reaserch Institute

چکیده [English]

In this research the effect of Bioplus B2 probiotic and galactooligosaccharide prebiotic (GOS) on performance, egg quality, and some blood parameters of commercial laying hens were investigated in a sample of 216 hy-line laying hens (w36) with the same average weight aging 50 to 62 weeks for a period of 12 weeks in a completely randomized design with 6 treatments, 6 replications and 6 hens per each replication in the cage system. Experimental treatments included 1) without additives (as control), 2) diets containing 0.1% Bioplus B2 probiotic, 3) to 6) diets; containing, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.20 % of galactooligosaccharides prebiotic, respectively.  The results indicated that both egg weight and mass was increased significantly (P<0.05) in the Bioplus B2 probiotic treatment. Egg production percentage, feed intake and feed conversion ratio were not significantly influenced by treatments. Using galactooligosaccharide at the levels of 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 percent improved dry eggshell weight significantly while the levels of 0.05, 0.15 and 0.2 percent increased eggshell weight per unit area compared to the control (P<0.05). Total protein and albumin of serum increased in the Bioplus B2 treatment (P<0.05). Using Bioplus B2 probiotic and 0.15% galactooligosaccharide significantly decreased blood cholesterol level (P<0.05). In general, the results showed that the using of prebiotic galactooligosaccharide at the level of 0.15 % increases the weight of eggshell per unit area, decreases the blood serum cholesterol, and improves some performance traits compared to control group, therefore it can be used instead of probiotic Bioplus B2.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Blood lipid parameters
  • Galacto oligosaccharide
  • Laying hen
  • Performance
  • Prebiotics
  • Probiotics
  1. Abdelqader A (2017) Egg Innovations and Strategies for Improvements. Edited by: Patricia Y Hester Chapter 27: Use of Dietary Probiotics to Improve Laying Hen Performance. Academic Press, 283-295.
  2. Abdelqader A, Irshaid R and Al-Fataftah AR (2013) Effects of dietary probiotic inclusion on performance, eggshell quality, cecal microflora composition, and tibia traits of laying hens in the late phase of production. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 45(4): 1017-1024.
  3. Afsari M, Mohebbifar A and Torki M (2014) Effects of dietary inclusion of olive pulp supplemented with probiotics on productive performance, egg quality and blood parameters of laying hens. Annual Research and Review in Biology, 4(1): 198-211.
  4. Aghaii A, Chaji M, Mohammadabadi T and Sari M (2010) The effect of probiotic supplementation on production performance, egg quality and serum and egg chemical composition of lying hens. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9(21), 2774-2777.
  5. Al-Khalaifah HS (2018) Benefits of probiotics and/or prebiotics for antibiotic-reduced poultry. Poultry Scienc, 97: 588–593.
  6. Amani WY, Hassan HMA, Ali HM, Mohamed MA (2013) Effect of probiotic, prebiotic and organic acid on layer performance and egg quality. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 7(2): 66-74.
  7. Baba E, Nagaishi S, Fukata T and Arakava A (1996) The role of intestinal microflora on the prevention of salmonelle colonization in gnobiotic chicks. Poultry Science, 70: 1902-1907.
  8. Chen YC, Nakthong C and Chen TC (2005) Improvement of laying hen performance by dietary prebiotic chicory oligofructose and inulin. International Journal of Poultry Science, 4(2): 103-108.
  9. Davis GS and Anderson KE (2002) The effects of feeding the direct-fed microbial, Primalac, on growth parameters and egg production in single comb white leghorn hens. Poultry Science, 81(6): 755-759.
  10. Farouk deraz S (2018) Synergetic effects of multispecies probiotic supplementation on certain blood parameters and serum biochemical profile of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Health and Production, 6: 1-27.
  11. Hosseini Mansoub N (2011) Comparative effect of butyric acid, probiotic and garlic on performance and serum composition of broiler chickens. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 11: 507-511.
  12. Hughes RJ (1984) Estimation of Shell Surface Area from Measurements of Length, Breadth, and Weight of Hen Eggs. Poultry Science, 63: 2471-2474
  13. Javheri Z, Shahbazi HR and Moradi S (2018) Effects of different levels of dinamion prebiotic and Biotronic organic acid on immune response and blood parameters in laying hens. Veterinary Researches and Biological Products, 118: 153-161. (In Persian).
  14. Jung SJ, Houde R, Baurhoo B, Zhao X and Lee BH (2008) Effects of galacto-oligosaccharides and a bifidobacteria lactis-based probiotic strain on the growth performance and fecal microflora of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 87: 1694-1699
  15. Kalavathy R, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S and Ho YW (2003) Effects of Lactobacillus cultures on growth performance, abdominal fat deposition, serum lipids and weight of organs of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 44(1):139-144.
  16. Leeson S and Summers JD (2008) Commercial poultry nutrition. 3rd edition. Pp: 1-10 (Nottingham University Press).
  17. Lotfi K, Mahdavi A, Jebelli Javan A, Staji H and Darabighane B (2019) Effects of different level of resistant starch on growth performance and ileum morphology in broiler. A comparition to fructooligosaccharide and zinc bacitracin. Iranian journal of Applied Animal Science, 9: 315-322.
  18. Luoma A, Markazi A, Shanmugasundaram R, Murugesan GR, Mohnl M and Selvaraj R (2017) Effect of synbiotic supplementation on layer production and cecal Salmonella load during a Salmonella challenge. Poultry Science, 96(12): 4208-4216.
  19. Marelli SP, Mangiagalli MG, Giardini A, Carteri S, Galimberti P and Guidobono Cavalchini L (2008) Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL in different milk-based diets: Effect on egg characteristics. Proc. 1st Mediterr. Summit Porto Carras, Chalkidiki, Greece. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 64: 26.D2/CSL in different milk-based diets: Effect on egg characteristics. Proc. 1st Mediterr. Summit Porto Carras, Chalkidiki, Greece. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 64: 26.
  20. Matéova S, Gaalova M, Saly J and Fialkovicova M (2009) Investigation of the effect of probiotics and potentiated probiotics on productivity of laying hens. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 54: 24-30.
  21. Mikulski D, Jankowski J, Naczmanski J, Mikulska M and Demey V (2012) Effects of dietary probiotic (Pediococcus acidilactici) supplementation on performance, nutrient digestibility, egg traits, egg yolk cholesterol, and fatty acid profile in laying hens. Poultry Science, 91(10): 2691-2700.
  22. Mohseni Gharechopogh A, Fakhraei J, Hosseini SA, Mansoori Yarahmadi H, Lotfollahian H (2021) Performance, immune response and blood biochemistry of broiler chickens fed with plant growth compound. Tropical Animal Science Journal, 44(1): 62-70.
  23. Nobakht A and Mehmannavz Y (2010) Effects of different levels of probiotics (bioplus) on performance, egg quality traits and serum biochemical parameters of laying hens. Journal of New Veterinary Research, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord Branch, 4: 33-40. (In Persian).
  24. Panda AK, Rama Rao SS, Raju MV and Sharma SS (2008) Effect of probiotic (Lactobacillus sporogenes) feeding on egg production and quality, yolk cholesterol and humoral immune response of White Leghorn layer breeders. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 88(1): 43-47.
  25. Ramasamy K, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S, Wong, M, Ho YW (2009) Effects of Lactobacillus cultures on performance of laying hens, and total cholesterol, lipid and fatty acid composition of egg yolk. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 89: 482-486.
  26. Ribeiro JV, Albino LFT, Rostagno HS, Barreto SLT, Hannas MI, Harrington D, Araujo FA, Ferreira JHC and Ferreira MA (2014) Effects of the dietary supplementation of Bacillus subtilis levels on performance, egg quality and excreta moisture of layers. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 195: 142-146.
  27. Roberts JR (2019) Egg Quality Reference Manual. A resource to further inform producers about egg and egg shell quality. First Edition, Australian Eggs Limited.
  28. Shahir MH, Mohammadi M, Ghazi Sh, Afsarian O and Moradi S (2012) The effect of probiotics and calcium butyrate on production performance, egg quality, blood parameters and immune response of laying hens. Journal of Veterinary Research, 67(4): 313-323. (In Persian).
  29. Sobczak A and Kozłowski K (2015) The effect of a probiotic preparation containing Bacillus subtilis ATCC PTA-6737 on egg production and physiological parameters of laying hens. Annals of Animal Science, 15(3): 711-723.
  30. St-Onge MP, Farnworth ER and Jones PJH (2000) Consumption of fermented and nonfermented dairy products: Effects on cholesterol concentrations and metabolism. Amimal Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71: 674-681.
  31. Swiatkiewicz S, Koreleski J and Arczewska A (2010). Laying performance and eggshell quality in laying hens fed diets supplemented bith prebiotics and organic acid. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 55: 294-304.
  32. Yang CM, Cao GT, Ferket PR, Liu TT, Zhou L, Zhang L, Xiao YP and Chen AG (2012) Effects of probiotic, Clostridium butyricum, on growth performance, immune function, and cecal microflora in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 91: 2121-2129.
  33. Zarei M, Ehsani M and Torki M (2011) Dietry inclusion of probiotics and symbiotic and evaluating performance of laying hen. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 6: 249-255.
  34. Zhang JL, Xie QM, Ji J, Yang WH, Wu YB, Li C and Bi YZ (2012) Different combinations of probiotics improve the production performance, egg quality, and immune response of layer hens. Poultry Science, 91(11): 2755-2760.