نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترا

2 استاد دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، تخصص: تغذیه طیور

3 عضو هیأت علمی

چکیده

اثر مصرف سطوح مختلف مکمل نوکلئوتید در جیره بر عملکرد، خصوصیات لاشه، وضعیت سامانه ایمنی، ریخت شناسی روده کوچک و جمعیت میکروبی ایلئوم با استفاده از 308 قطعه جوجه گوشتی یک روزه سویه تجاری راس 308 مخلوط هر دو جنس در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با چهار تیمار، هفت تکرار و 11 قطعه جوجه در هرتکرار به مدت 42 روز بررسی شد. تیمارهای آزمایشی شامل جیره پایه بر اساس ذرت و کنجاله سویا(شاهد) و جیره پایه حاوی سطوح 05/0، 1/0 و 2/0 درصد مکمل نوکلئوتید بودند. مصرف خوراک، افزایش وزن بدن و ضریب تبدیل غذایی تحت تأثیر تیمارهای آزمایشی قرار نگرفتند. نتایج پاسخ سامانه ایمنی هومورالدر سن 35 روزگی نشان داد که غلظت IgMسرم خون در تیمار 2/0 درصد نوکلئوتید نسبت به تیمار 05/0 درصد بیشتر بود (05/0P<).غلظت IgGسرم خون در سن 35 روزگی در تیمار 05/0 درصد نوکلئوتید بیشتر از تیمار 2/0 درصد بود (05/0P<). در سن 42 روزگی، غلظت IgG در تیمار 1/0 درصد مکمل نوکلئوتید نسبت به تیمار شاهد کمتر بود (05/0P<).پاسخ ایمنی سلولی در تیمار حاوی 1/0 درصد مکمل نوکلئوتید در 48 ساعت پس از تزریق فیتوهماگلوتینین بالاتر از تیمار شاهد بود(05/0P<). براساس نتا‌یج ا‌ین آزما‌یش، استفاده از مکمل نوکلئوتیدی پاسخ ایمنی سلولی جوجه‌های گوشتی رابهبودمی­بخشد اما تاثیری بر سایر فراسنجه‌ها ندارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of different dietary supplementation levels of nucleotide on performance, immune system, small intestine morphology and ileal microbial population of broiler chickens

نویسنده [English]

  • Ahmad Hassanabadi 2

چکیده [English]

Effect of different dietary levels of nucleotide supplementation on performance, carcass characteristics, immune system status, small intestine morphology and ileal microbial population of broiler chickens was evaluated using 308 one-day-old mixed-sex Ross 308 broilers in a completely randomized design with 4 treatments and 7 replicates of 11 chicks in each, up to 42 days of age. Experimental treatments included a corn-soybean meal basal diet (control), and the basal diet containing 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 percent nucleotide supplementation. The results showed that feed intake, body weight gain and feed conversion ratio of the broilers were not significantly affected by experimental treatments. Results of humeral immune system response at 35 days of age showed that the blood serum IgM concentration in 0.2 percent nucleotide group was higher than 0.05 percent group(P< 0.05). Also, Serum IgG concentration in this age in 0.05 percent nucleotide group was higher than 0.2 percent group(P< 0.05). At 42 days of age, serum IgG concentration in 0.1 percent nucleotide treatment was lower than control group (P< 0.05). The cellular immune system response of chicks fed diet supplemented with 0.1 percent nucleotide at 48 hours after Phytohemagglutinin-P injection was higher than control treatment (P<0.05). On the basis of current experiment results, supplementation of broiler dietswith nucleotide improves cellular immune system response but has no significant effect on other parameters of broiler chickens.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Carcass yield
  • Immunoglobulin
  • Intestinal villi
  • Lymphatic organs
  • weight gain
1.       Andres-Elias N, Pujols J, Badiol I and Torrallardona D (2007) Effect of nucleotides and carob pulp on gut health and performance of weanling piglets. Livestock Science 108: 280-283.
2.       Asadi M, Mohammadi M and Roostaei Alimehr M (2013) Effect of Alcoholic Chicory (Cichorium Intybus L.) Extract on Performance and Immune Response of Broilers.Research on Animal Production 9:36-47 (in Persian).
3.       Aviagen (2014) Nutrition Specifications Manual: Ross 308. Aviagen Ltd., Scotland, UK.
4.       Biagina C, Vittorio P, Giovanni S, Enrico A, Vincenzo C and Luigi L (2011) Nucleotides in broiler chicken diet: effect on breast muscles quality. Food Science 4: 308–317.
5.       Boza J (1998) Nucleotide in infant nutrition. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde 146: 39–48.
6.       Burrells C, William PD and Forno PF (2001) Dietary nucleotides: a novel supplement in fish feeds.Effects on resistance to diseases in salmonids. Aquaculture 199: 159-169.
7.       Byoungyun J (2011) Evaluation of dietary nucleotides for broilers. The University of Georgia, Ph.D. Dissertation.
8.       Chiofalo B, Lopresti V, Agazzi A, Invernizzi G, Chiofalo V and Liotta L (2006) Administration of nucleotides in poultry’s diet: Effect on the lipid composition of the pectoralis major muscle. World Poultry Science Journal 62 (Suppl.): 320–321.
9.       Deng K, Wong CW and Nolan JV (2005) Carry-over effects of dietary yeast RNA as a source of NT on lymphoid organs and immune responses in Leghorn-type chickens. British Poultry Science 46: 673-678.
10.     Esteve-garcia E, Martinez-puig D, Borda E and Chetrit C (2007) Efficacy of a nucleotides preparation in broiler chickens. Proceedings of the 16th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Strasbourg, France, Pp. 511–514.
11.     Gatlin DM and Li P (2006). Nucleotide nutrition in fish: Current knowledge and future applications. Aquaculture 251: 141– 152.
12.     Gheshlagh Olyayee M, Golian A , Bassami MR , Haghparast A and Heravi Moussavi A (2014) Influence of in ovo injection of L-Glutamine on pre- and post- hatch growth performance, small intestine morphology and immune responses in broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science Researches 24(3): 65-79 (in Persian).
13.     Hashemi SR, Zulkifli I, Davoodi H, Zunita Z and Ebrahimi M (2012) Growth performance, intestinal microflora, plasma fatty acid profile in broiler chickens fed herbal plant (Euphorbiahirta) and mix of acidifiers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 178: 167-174.
14.     Iji PA, Saki AA and Tivey DR (2001) Intestinal development and body growth of broiler chicks on diets supplemented with non-starch polysaccharides. Animal Feed Science and Technology 89: 175-188.
15.     Jung B and Batal AB (2012) Effect of dietary nucleotide supplementation on performance and development of the gastrointestinal tract of broilers. British Poultry Science 53: 98-105.
16.     Lerner A and Shamir R (2000) Nucleotides in infant nutrition: a must or an option. Israel Medical Association Journal 2: 772–774.
17.     Low C, Wadsworth S, Burrells C and Secombes CJ (2003) Expression of immune genes in turbot (Scophthalmu smaximus) fed a nucleotide supplemented diet. Aquaculture 221: 23-40.
18.     Martinez-Puig D, Manzanilla EG, Morales J, Borda E, Perez JF, Pineiro C and Chetrit C (2007) Dietary nucleotide supplementation reduces occurrence of diarrhea in early weaned pigs. Livestock Science 108: 276-279.
19.     National Research Council (1994) Nutrient requirement of poultry. 9th review edition. National Academy Press. Washington D.C.
20.     Pelícia VC and Sartori JR (2010) Effect of nucleotides on broiler performance and carcass yield. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 12: 31-34.
21.     Pesti, GM, Miller BR and Hargrave J (1992) User-Friendly Feed Formulation, Done Again (UFFDA). Programed by J. Hargrave. University of Georgia, USA.
22.     SAS Institute (2004) SAS User’s Guide. SAS Institute. Inc. Cary. NC.
23.     VanLeeuwen P,Verdonk JM, Wagenaars CM and Kwakernaak C (2005) Effects of fructooligosaccharide inclusion in diets on performance before and after inoculations with Eimeria acervulina and Clostridium perfringens in broilers. Animal Science 5: 1-27.
24.     Voet D and Voet JG (2004) Nucleotides metabolism. In: Biochemistry. 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Eds.), New York, NY, Pp. 1069–1079.
25.     Yaghobi M, Dorafshan S, Paykan Heyrati F and Mahmoudi N (2014) Growth performance and some haematological parameters of ornamental striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) fed on dietary nucleotide. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research48: 262-265.
26.     Yang N, Larsen CT, Dunnington EA, Geraert PA, Picard M and Siegel PB (2000) Immune competence of chicks from two lines divergently selected for antibody response to sheep red blood cells as affected by supplemental vitamin E. Poultry Science 79: 799-803.