An investigation of eight Iranian and nine imported Chinese silkworm hybrids for performances of some production and viability traits

Abdoli, Ramin; Sourati Zanjani, Reza; Hosseini Moghaddam, Seyed Hosein; Rafeie, Farjad

doi:10.22059/jap.2024.375783.623794

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

¹ Corresponding Author, Iran Silk Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Guilan, Iran. E-mail: ramin.abdoli.ramin.abdoli@gmail.com

² Iran Silk Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Guilan, Iran. E-mail: rezasourati@yahoo.com

³ Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran. E-mail: hosseini@guilan.ac.ir

⁴ Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran. E-mail: farjad.rafeie@guilan.ac.ir

10.22059/jap.2024.375783.623794

Abstract

Introduction: Considering the importance of comparing the silkworm performances of Iranian and imported commercial hybrids from China production traits, viability index and cocoon dimensions index were investigated in eight Iranian (31×32, 32×31, 103×104, 104×103, 151×154, 154×151, 153×154 and 154×153), and nine imported Chinese commercial hybrids (Suju×Minghu (S×M), Minghu×Suju (M×S), Baiyue×Qiufeng (B×Q), Qiufeng×Baiyue (Q×B), BaiyueB×QiufengA (BB×QA), QiufengA×BaiyueB (QA×BB), 781×7532, Lianggang No2 and Guican No 5) in the present study.
Materials and Methods: After eggs hatched and according to the standard protocols, the studied hybrids were reared under the same conditions at Iran Silk Research Center (ISRC). Statistical analyses were done in three replications of 200 larvae (totally 600 records per each hybrid) based on completely randomized design. For comparing the means, Tukey's statistical test was used at a significance level of P<0.05. The GLM procedure was used in SAS software version 9.4. Data generated in respect of the studied traits were subjected for further analysis by a multiple trait evaluation index using the following formula: evaluation index (E.I.)= (A-B/C×10) + 50, where A is value of a particular breed for particular trait, B is mean value for a particular trait of all the hybrids, C is standard deviation of a particular trait for all the hybrids, 10 is standard unit and 50 is fixed value. Minimum / average Evaluation Index (E.I) value fixed for selection of a hybrid is >50. Based on the evaluation index (E.I) consisted of production traits and viability, best hybrids were identified.
Results and Discussion: The result of the research showed the close competition between Iranian and Chinese silkworm hybrids. In the situation that the performance of Iranian 32×31 and 31×32 hybrids for traits related to weight, shell weight and shell percentage of best cocoons was higher than the other hybrids but based on a composite index that was used in this research, 151×154, 154×151, 153×154 and 154×153 hybrids showed superiority. Based on this index, M×S and S×M as well as BB×QA and QA×BB had a higher average than the other hybrids. This result is based on the average of two-way crosses for the hybrids that both pairs were used in the experiment.
Conclusion: Generally, the results of mean comparisons and evaluation index showed that Iranian hybrids had better performance in all traits related to produce cocoons than the Chinese hybrids. Although, Chinese hybrids were significantly different from the Iranian for pupa viability percentage trait as Lianggang No2 hybrid showed the highest value.

Keywords

References

بیابانی، محمدرضا؛ خضریان، علی؛ خیرخواه رحیم‌آباد، یوسف؛ شهبازی، فتح الله؛ طیب نعیمی، سیده خیرالنساء؛ صورتی زنجانی، رضا؛ جلوه زیده سرائی، بیژنگ؛ صیداوی، علیرضا و پورقاسمی، محمدرضا (1400). مقایسه هیبریدهای وارداتی و داخلی کرم ابریشم. محیط زیست جانوری، 13(1)، 387-396.

حسینی مقدم، سیدحسین (1392). اصول پرورش کرم ابریشم. چاپ دوم. انتشارات دانشگاه گیلان. 172 صفحه.

خردادی، محمدرضا؛ حسینی مقدم، سیدحسین؛ صبوری، عاطفه؛ محفوظی، کامران (1400). معرفی هیبریدهای برتر کرم ابریشم در مناطق مختلف جغرافیایی استان گیلان. تحقیقات تولیدات دامی، 10(2)، 25-38.

عبدلی، رامین؛ صورتی زنجانی، رضا؛ خیرخواه رحیم‌آباد، یوسف؛ حسینی مقدم، سید حسین؛ عبدالهی مصباح، رحیم و قوی حسین زاده، نوید (1402). مقایسه عملکرد هیبریدهای وارداتی کرم ابریشم چینی. تحقیقات تولیدات دامی، 12(3)، 97-107.

نعمت الهیان، شهلا و علی پناه، مسعود (1401). عملکرد برخی صفات تولیدی هیبریدهای ایرانی و چینی کرم ابریشم در دو منطقه ایران. تولیدات دامی، 24(2)، 139-149.

علی پناه، مسعود؛ نصیری، عبدالعظیم؛ سیددخت، عاطفه؛ نعمت الهیان، شهلا؛ عابدیان، ذبیح الله و سرجمعی، فرید (1402). بررسی مقایسهای عملکرد هیبریدهای ایرانی و وارداتی کرم ابریشم در استان خراسان رضوی. زیست شناسی جانوری، 16(1)، 45-57.

علی پناه، مسعود؛ نصیری، عبدالعظیم؛ عابدیان، ذبیح الله و سرجمعی، فرید (1399). بررسی عملکرد هفت هیبرید کرم ابریشم در تربت‌حیدریه. پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران، 12(3)، 399-409.

میرحسینی، سیدضیاالدین؛ صیداوی، علیرضا؛ غنیپور، مانی؛ ویشکایی صدیق، صغری و بیژن نیا، علیرضا (1386). عملکرد آمیخته‌های جدید کرم ابریشم ایران در دو فصل بهار و پاییز. مجله دانش کشاورزی، 17(4)، 135-141.

نعمت الهیان، شهلا؛ طرفه، علی؛ مواجپورف معین الدین؛ حسینس مقدم، سید حسین و صیداوی، علیرضا (1395). بررسی توان تولید هیبریدهای مختلف کرم ابریشم داخلی و خارجی. محیط زیست جانوری، 8 (1)، 85-94.

References

Abdoli, R., Sourati Zanjani, R., Kheirkhah Rahimabad, Y., Hosseini Moghaddam, S. H., Abdolahi Mesbah, R., & Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, N. (2023). Performance comparison of the Chinese imported silkworm hybrids. Animal Production Research, 12 (3), 97-107. (in Persian)

Alipanah, M., Abedian, Z., Nasiri, A., & Sarjamei, F. (2020). Performance of seven silkworm varieties in Torbat Heydarieh. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 12 (3), 399-409. (in Persian)

Alipanah, M., Nasiri, A., Seyeddokht, A., Nematollahian, S., Abedian, Z., & Sarjamei, F. (2023) The comparative study on the performance of Iranian and Chinese silkworms, Bombyx mori L., hybrids in Khorasan Razavi province. Journal of Animal Biology, 1(16), 45-57. (in Persian)

Ashoka, J., & Govinddan, R. (1994). Performance of some Bivoltine silkworm breeds and their single and double cross hybrids for yield and cocoon traits. Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 7(1), 28-31.

Biabani, M., Khezrian, A., Kheirkhah Rahimabad, Y., Shahbazi, F., Tayeb Naeimise, S. K., Sourati Zanjani, R., Jelveh Zideh Saraei, B., Seidavi, A., & Poorghasemi, M. (2021). Comparison about import and inner silkworm’s hybrids. Journal of Animal Environment, 13(1), 387-396. (in Persian)

Bu, C., Zheng, R., Huang, G., Wu, J., Liu, G., Donald, M. L., & Xu, X. (2022). The differences in cocoon and silk qualities among sex-related mulberry and silkworm feeding groups. Plos ONE, 17(6), e0270021.

Hosseini Moghaddam, S. H. (2013). Principles of Silkworm Breeding. Publisher: University of Guilan. (in Persian)

Joseph Raj, A. N., Sundaram, R., Mahesh, V. G., Zhuang, Z., & Simeone, A. (2019). A multi-sensor system for silkworm cocoon gender classification via image processing and support vector machine. Sensors, 19(12), 2656.

Khordadi, M. R., Hosseini Moghaddam, S. H., Sabouri, A., & Mahfoozi, K. (2021). Introducing superior silkworm hybrids for different geographical regions of Guilan province. Animal Production Research, 10(2), 25-38. (in Persian)

Kumaresan, P., Sinha, R. K., & Rajeurs, S. (2007). An analysis of genetic variation and divergence in Indian tropical polyvoltine silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) genotypes. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 5, 11-18.

Mahesh, V. G., Raj, A. N. J., & Celik, T. (2017). Silkworm cocoon classification using fusion of zernike moments-based shape descriptors and physical parameters for quality egg production. International Journal of Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications, 16(3), 246-268.

Mano, Y., Kumar, N. S., Basavaraja, H. K., Reddy, N. M., & Datta, R. K. (1993). A new method to select promising silkworm breeds/combinations. Indian Silk, 31, 53.

Manohar Reddy, R., Sinha, M. K., Hansda, G., Vijaya Prakash, N. B. (2009). Application of parents by selection for basic and commercial seed efficiency in tropical tasar silkworm, Antheraea mylitta Drury (lepidoptera: saturniidae). Academic Journal of Entomology, 2, 56-61.

Maqbool, A., Malik, G. N., Dar, H. U., Afifa, S., Kamili, S., & Zaffar, G. (2005). Genetic analysis of 12 quantitative characters in some bivoltine silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) genotypes. Indian Journal of Sericulture, 44, 156-158.

Mirhoseini, S. Z., Seidavi, A., Ghanipoor, M., Vishkaei, S., & Bizhannia, A. (2008). Performance of new hybrids of silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) in spring and autumn seasons. Journal of Agricultural Knowledge, 17(4), 135-141. (in Persian)

Mirhosseini, S. Z., Ghanipoor, M., Shadparvar, A., & Etebari, K. (2005). Selection indices for cocoon traits in six commercial silkworm (Bombyx mori) lines. Philippine Agricultural Scientist, 88, 328-336.

Nematollahian, S., & Alipanah, M. (2021). Some production traits performance of Iranian and Chinese silkworm hybrids in two regions of Iran. Animal Production, 24 (2), 139-149. (in Persian)

Nematollahian, S., Torfeh, A., Mavvajpour, M., Hosseini Moghadam, S. H., & Seidavi, A. (2016). Study of production potential of Iranian and non-Iranian different silkworm hybrids. Journal of Animal Environment, 8(1), 85-94. (in Persian)

Nila J. N., & Jones R. D. (2021). Performance of some newly produced multivoltine strains of Bombyx Mori (Linnaeus) for commercially vibrant qualitative and quantitative traits. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 41(1), 273-284.

Raju, P. J., Krishnamurthy, N. B. (1993) Breeding of two bivoltines, MG511 and MG512, of silkworm, Bombyx mori L., for higher viability and silk productivity. Sericologia, 33, 577-587.

Singh, N., Tara, J. S., Tayal, M. K., Kour, A., Sudan, K., Sharma, K., Kumar, V., Sharma, A., & Mahroof, A. (2016). Evaluation of different silkworm hybrids in Jammu region. International Journal of Advanced Research, 4(8), 201-204.

An investigation of eight Iranian and nine imported Chinese silkworm hybrids for performances of some production and viability traits

References

References

Volume 26, Issue 3October 2024Pages 249-261

Volume 26, Issue 3
October 2024
Pages 249-261