Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Tehran University, Department of Animal Science

2 Department of animal science, Faculty of agriculture and natural sources, university of Tehran

3 University of Guilan,, Department of Animal Science

Abstract

The effect of the type of fat and different levels of betonies in the diet on production and quality indicators of feed (pellet) was investigated by using a completely randomized design with nine treatments and four replications. The experimental treatments included the combination of 0 and 1.5% crude soybean oil and calcium fat powder with three levels of betonies (0, 1 and, 2%). The measured indicators include the efficiency of the pellet press machine (electricity consumption, production rate per unit of time and dry matter of the final product), qualitative indicators of pellet after production (strength and hardness) and the percentage of intact pellets after feeder plats and lines in the poultry farm environment. The use of fat in the feed reduced the amount of electricity consumption and improved the production rate per unit of time and dry matter percentage of the final product compared to non-fat treatments. In this case, the production rate per unit of time in the fat powder treatment with 2% bentonite was higher than other treatments (P< 0.05). The pellet durability index that was evaluated by tumbling method in fat powder treatment without bentonite was higher than other experimental treatments (P<0.05). In addition, the percentage of intact pellets after auto feeder lines was higher in fat-containing treatments, particularly fat powder treatment without bentonite, than other treatments (P<0.05). The highest correlation coefficient between the percentage of intact pellets and the pellet durability index was related to the Tumbling method in auto feeder lines. Based on the results of the present experiment, using fat powder instead of oil in pellet feed and adding one percent of bentonite to the diet improves the pellet quality and its production performance indicators in the factory.
 

Keywords

1. Abdollahi MR, Ravindran V and Svihus B 
(2013) Pelleting of broiler diets: an overview 
with emphasis on pellet quality and nutritional 
value. Animal Feed Science and Technology 
179: 1-23 
2. AOAC. (1995) Animal Feed. Chapter 4. in 
Official methods of analysis’. 16th edition. 
AOAC International, Arlington, VI, USA. 30 pp. 
3. ASAE. (1997) Cubes, Pellets, and Crumbles: 
Definitions and Methods for Determining 
Density, Durability, and Moisture Content. 
ASAE Standard S269.4. American Society of 
Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. 
Joseph, MI. 
4. Attar A, Kermanshahi, H and Golian A (2018) 
Effects of conditioning time and sodium 
bentonite on pellet quality, growth 
performance, intestinal morphology and 
nutrient retention in finisher broilers. British 
Poultry Science 59: 190-197. 
5. Briggs JL, Maier DE, Watkins BA and 
Behnke, KC (1999). Effect of ingredients and 
processing parameters on pellet quality. 
Poultry Science 78: 1464-1471. 
6. Cavalcanti WB and Behnke KC (2005) Effect 
of composition of feed model systems on pellet 
quality: a mixture experimental approach. II. 
Cereal Chemistry 82: 462-467. 
7. Corzo AL, Mejia and Loar RF (2011) Effect of 
pellet quality on various broiler production 
parameters. J. Appl. Poult. Res 20: 68-74. 
8. Hancock CJ (2010) Impact of feed form and 
nutrient distribution in an automated 
commercial broiler feeding system. Master 
dissertation, Kansas State University. 
9. Kersten J, Rohde HR, Nef E and Almann, H 
(2005) Principles of mixed feed production: 
components, processes, technology. 
Agrimedia. Germany. 
10. Loar RE, Wamsley KGS, Evans A, Moritz, JS 
and Corzo A (2014) Effects of varying 
conditioning temperature and mixer-added fat 
on feed manufacturing efficiency, 28-to 42-day 
broiler performance, early skeletal effect, and 
true amino acid digestibility. Journal of 
Applied Poultry Research 23(3): 444-455. 
11. Massuquetto AJF, Durau VG, Schramm MV, 
Teixeira Netto EL, Krabbe and Maiorka A 
(2018) Influence of feed form and conditioning 
time on pellet quality, performance and ileal 
nutrient digestibility in broilers. J Appl Poult 
Res 27: 51-58. 
12. Mckinney LJ and Teeter RG (2004) Predicting 
effective caloric value of nonnutritive factors: I.
Pellet quality and II. Prediction of consequential 
formulation dead zones. Poult Sci 83: 1165-1174. 
13. Mohammadi GHasem Abadi, M.H, Moravej 
H, Shivazad M, Karimi Torshizi MA and Kim 
WK (2019) Effect of different types and levels 
of fat addition and pellet binders on physical 
pellet quality of broiler feeds. poult sci 98: 4745-4754.14. Moritz JS (2011) Increasing mixer-added fat 
reduces the electrical energy required for 
pelleting and improves exogenous enzyme 
efficacy for broilers. Journal of Applied 
Poultry Research 20(1): 75-89. 
15. Moritz JS, Cramer KR, Wilson KJ and Beyer RS 
(2003) Feed manufacture and feeding of rations 
with graded levels of added moisture formulated 
to different energy densities. Journal of Applied 
Poultry Research 12: 371-381. 
16. Muramatsu K, Maiorka A, Vaccari ICM, Reis 
RN, Dahlke F, Pinto AA, Dias Orlando UA, 
Bueno M and Imagawa M (2013) Impact of 
particle size, thermal processing, fat inclusion 
and moisture addition on pellet quality and 
protein solubility of broiler feeds. Journal of 
Agricultural Science and Technology. A, 
3(12A), 1017. 
17. Richardson W and EJ, Day (1976) Effect of 
varying levelsof added fat in broiler diets on 
pellet quality. Feedstuffs (May 17): 24. 
18. Salas-Bringas C, Plassen L, Lekang O and 
Schuller RB (2007). Measuring physical quality 
of pelleted feed by texture profile analysis, a new
pellet tester and comparisons to other common 
measurement devices. Annual TransactionsNordic Rheology Society 15: 149. 
19. Singh Y, Ravindran V, Wester TJ, Molan AL 
and Ravindran G (2014) Influence of feeding 
coarse corn on performance, nutrient utilization, 
digestive tract measurements, carcass 
characteristics, and cecal microflora counts of 
broilers. Poultry Science 93: 607-616.
20. Svihus B, Kløvstad KH, Perez V, Zimonja O, 
Sahlstrom S, Schuller RB, Jeksrud WK and 
Prestløkken E (2004) Physical and nutritional 
effects of pelleting of broiler chicken diets made 
from wheat ground to different coarsenesses by 
the use of roller mill and hammer mill. Anim 
Feed Sci Technol 117: 281-293. 
21. Thomas M (1998) Physical quality of pelleted 
feed, a feed model study. PhD Thesis, 
Wageningen Agricultural University. 
22. Thomas M van der poel AFB (1996) Physical 
quality of pelleted animal feed: 1 Criteria for 
pellet quality. Anim Feed Sci Technol 61:89-112. 
23. Winowiski TS (1995) Pellet quality in animal 
feeds. American soybean association, lingo 
tech., FT, 21, 1-5. 
24. Zimonja O (2009) Current issues in pelleting 
in respect to physical pellet analyses. Pages 
45-50. In 1st Workshop Feed-to-Food FP7 
REGPOT-3. XIII Sym. Feed Technol. Proc. 
Institute for Food Technology. Novi Sad, 
Serbia. 
25. Zimonja O, Stevnebø A and Svihus B (2007) 
Nutritional value of diets for broiler chickens 
as affected by fat source, amylose level and 
diet processing. Canadian Journal of Animal 
Science 87: 553-562