Journal of Animal Production, Print ISSN: 2008-6776., Online ISSN: 2382-994X

Comparing the effects of sponge and CIDER on vaginal health, estrous synchronization, and reproductive performance in ewes

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Esameel Rouzrokh 1
Armin Towhidi 2
saeed zaeinoaldini 3
Mojtaba Emamverdi 4

1 M.Sc. Student, Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

2 Professor, University College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Animal Science, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

4 Ph.D., Former Student,, Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22059/jap.2022.336853.623667
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to compare sponge and cider with two different brands in estrous synchronicity, vaginal health and off-breeding performance in Moghani ewes. For this purpose, 120 ewes of Moghani breed were selected and randomly divided into four experimental groups. Ewes in the first and second groups, using sponge Sponjavet and CIDER Eazi breed (as valid and common brands) for 12 days, respectively, and the third and fourth groups, respectively, using sponge Fluorojest and CIDER Progest (as New brands made jointly by Iran and China) were treated for 12 days. Ewes in all groups received 400 IU units of eCG at the time of sponge and cider harvest. The rate of vaginal mucosal discharge and adhesion in sponge was higher than cider (P< 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between reproduction and progesterone concentrations between CIDER and sponge as well as brands of these two tools.Therefore, due to lower price and similar efficiency, Sponge Fluorojest and CIDER Progest can be considered as an appropriate alternative to common commercial sponge and CIDER..

Keywords

Estrus synchronization
Conception
Short-term protocols
Reproduction
sheep
  1. Al-Hamedawi TM, Khammas DJ & Al-Ubaidi AS (2003) Effect of estrus synchronization on vaginal flora and subsequent fertility in ewes. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 16: 73-79.
  2. Ataman MB, Aköz M, Saribay MK, Erdem H & Bucak MN (2013) Prevention of embryonic death using different hormonal treatments in ewes. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 37(1): 6-8.
  3. Evans ACO, Duffy P, Crosby TF, Hawken PAR, Boland MP & Beard AP (2004) Effect of ram exposure at the end of progestagen treatment on estrus synchronisation and fertility during the breeding season in ewes. Animal Reproduction Science, 84(3-4): 349-358.
  4. Fleisch A, Werne S, Heckendorn F, Hartnack S, Piechotta M, Bollwein H ... & Janett F (2012) Comparison of 6-day progestagen treatment with Chronogest® CR and Eazi-breed™ CIDR® G intravaginal inserts for estrus synchronization in cyclic ewes. Small Ruminant Research, 107(2-3): 141-146.
  5. Fraczek M & Kurpisz M (2007) Inflammatory mediators exert toxic effects of oxidative stress on human spermatozoa. Journal of Andrology, 28(2): 325-333.
  6. Hosseinipanah SM, Anvarian M, Mousavinia M, Alimardan M, Hamzei S & Zengir SBM (2014) Effects of progesterone in synchronization of estrus and fertility in Shal ewes in nonproductive season. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 4(1): 83-86.
  7. Koyuncu MEHMET & Altınçekİç ȘÖ (2016) The effects of short-medium and long-term applications of fluorogestone acetate (FGA) on reproductive performance of Kıvırcık ewes at the onset of the breeding season. Yüzüncü Yil Üniversitesi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 26(3): 360-365.
  8. Martinez-Ros P, Lozano M, Hernandez F, Tirado A, Rios-Abellan A, López-Mendoza MC & Gonzalez-Bulnes A (2018) Intravaginal device-type and treatment-length for ovine estrus synchronization modify vaginal mucus and microbiota and affect fertility. Animals, 8(12): 226.
  9. Manes J, Campero C, Hozbor F, Alberio R & Ungerfeld R (2015) Vaginal histological changes after using intravaginal sponges for oestrous synchronization in anoestrous ewes. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 50(2): 270-274.
  10. Menchaca A & Rubianes E (2004) New treatments associated with timed artificial insemination in small ruminants. Reproduction Fertility and Development, 16(4): 403-413.
  11. Moeini MM, Moghaddam AA, Bahirale A & Hajarian H (2007) Effects of breed and progestin source on estrus synchronization and rates of fertility and fecundity in Iranian Sanjabi and Lori ewes. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences: PJBS, 10(21): 3801-3807.
  12. Ozyurtlu N, Kucukaslan I & Cetin Y (2010) Characterization of Oestrous Induction Response Oestrous Duration Fecundity and Fertility in Awassi Ewes During the non‐breeding Season Utilizing both CIDR and Intravaginal Sponge Treatments. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 45(3): 464-467.
  13. Omontese BO, Rekwot PI, Makun HJ, Obidi JA, Rwuaan JS & Chiezey NP (2010) Evaluation of EAZI-BreedTM CIDR® and FGA-30® intravaginal sponge as estrus synchronizing agents in pre-partum Red Sokoto does. Veterinary Research (Pakistan), 3(3): 64-69.
  14. Rhodes L & Nathanielsz PW (1988) Comparison of a controlled internal drug release device containing progesterone with intravaginal medroxyprogesterone sponges for estrus synchronization in ewes. Theriogenology, 30(4): 831-836.
  15. Shabankareh HK, Zandi M & Ganjali M (2010) First service pregnancy rates following post‐AI use of hCG in ovsynch and heatsynch programmes in lactating dairy cows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 45(4): 711-716.
  16. Swelum A, Alowaimer A & Abouheif M (2014) 18 Comparison between the efficiency of 30-mg flurogestone acetate intravaginal sponge (FGA-30) and controlled internal drug release (CIDR) to synchronize oestrus in ewes. Reproduction,Fertility and Development, 27: 101-102.
  17. Swelum AAA, Alowaimer AN & Abouheif MA (2015) Use of fluorogestone acetate sponges or controlled internal drug release for estrus synchronization in ewes: Effects of hormonal profiles and reproductive performance. Theriogenology, 84(4): 498-503.
  18. Scudamore CL (1988) Intravaginal sponge insertion technique. Veterinary Record.123 554.
  19. Suárez G, Zunino P, Carol H & Ungerfeld R (2006) Changes in the aerobic vaginal bacterial mucous load and assessment of the susceptibility to antibiotics after treatment with intravaginal sponges in anestrous ewes. Small Ruminant Research, 63(1-2): 39-43.
  20. Vilariño M, Rubianes E, Van Lier E & Menchaca A (2010) Serum progesterone concentrations follicular development and time of ovulation using a new progesterone releasing device (DICO®) in sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 91(2-3): 219-224.
  21. Vasconcelos CODP, Brandão FZ, Martins G, Penna B, Souza-Fabjan JMGD & Lilenbaum W (2016) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of bacteria from vaginitis associated with intravaginal implants in ewes following estrus synchronization. Ciência Rural, 46: 632-636.
  22. Zonturlu AK, Aral F, Ozyurtlu N & Yavuzer U (2008) Synchronization of estrus using FGA and CIDR intravaginal pessaries during the transition period in awassi ewes. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 7(9): 1093-1096.

 

 

Journal of Animal Production, Print ISSN: 2008-6776., Online ISSN: 2382-994X
Volume 24, Issue 4
Autumn 2022
Pages 501-509

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us