Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Abstract

In this study production, reproduction, management and economic parameters obtained from 7 flocks with 600 head of native sheep were used during annual cycle of production in village systems. The economic values of traits were estimated using maximizing profit, revenue per cost and minimizing cost method. The results showed that the average profit per sheep per year, revenue per cost ratio and cost per revenue ratio for this system were 3,211,391Rials, 1.40 and 0.713, respectively. Feeding and husbandry costs represented about 64% and 20% of total cost, respectively. In maximizing profit method, average economic values (relative) of traits were 7,550.139 (1.102) Rials for survival rate, 7,630.49 (1.1143) Rials for conception rate, 7,172.632 (1.0475) Rials for lambing frequency, 6,520.575 (0.95228) Rials for lambing rate, 7,969 (0.9164) Rials for lamb survival rate to weaning, 8,150.719 (1.1903) Rials for kid survival rate to yearling, 6,847.3565 (1.00) Rials for lamb live weight at sale, -2610 (-1.93) Rials  for body weight of sheep. In revenue per cost method the average economic values of aforementioned traits in all systems were 0.677, 0,683, 0.646, 0.592, 0.711, 0.726, 0.566, -0.293 respectively. The sensitivity of economic values to changes in prices of input parameters was low and to changes of prices in output parameters was high. Since the input parameters used in this study were collected from a wide range of management and climates conditions, estimated economic values could be used for designing the appropriate selection index for Kordi sheep.

Keywords

  1. Abdollahy  HO, Hasani SA, Zerehdaran SA, Shadparvar AA and Mahmoudi BE (2012) Determination of economic values  for some important traits inMoghani sheep. Small Ruminant Research. 105: 161– 169.
  2. Ali Saghi DA (2016) the effects of genetic and non genetic factors on survival and iongevity of kourdi lambs from birth to yearling. َAnimal science journal (pajouhesh & sazandegi).112: 65-78( In Persian )
  3. Bagheri Mo (2002) estimated the economic values of some economically important traits in Lori-Bakhtiari sheep. Master's thesis.Faculty of Agricultural Sciences. Sari-Mazandaran University. 55. (In Persian)
  4. Bett RC, Kosgey IS, Bebe BO and Kahi AK (2007b) Breeding goals for th kenydual purpose gots. II. Estimation of economic values for production and fuctional traits. Trop. Animal Helth Prod. 39: 467-475.
  5. Haghdoost AD, Shadparvar AA, Beigi Nasiri MO and Fayaz JA (2012) Estimates of economic values for traits of Arabic sheep in village system. Small Ruminant Research. 80: 91–94.
  6. Kosgey IS, Van Arendonk AM and Baker RL (2004) Economic values for traits in breeding objectives for sheep in the tropics. Livest. Prod. Sci. 88: 143-160.
  7. Lavvaf A, Zandi MB and Noshari AL (2014)  Estimation of Economic Values of Productive Traits in Taleshi Sheep of Iran. J. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science. 4(3): 527-530.
  8. Mousazadeh LE, SHadparvar AA and Eskandarinasab MP (2012) Estimation of economic values for production and reproduction traits of Afshari sheep in rurul sestem. j. Research Journal of Anima Science . 22(2):44-35. (In Persian)
  9. Ponzoni RW (1988) The derivation of economic values combining different ways- an example with Australian Merino sheep. J. Animal. Breed. Genet. 105: 143-153
  10. Van Arendok AM (1991) Use of profit equations to determine relative economic value of daiy cattle herd life and production from field data. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 1101-1107.
  11. Vatankhah M (2005) Defining a proper breeding scheme for Lori-Bakhtiari  sheep under village  system. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Tehran, Iran.
  12. Vatankhah MA, Talebi  MA and Bagheri MO (2010). A Comparison of Breeding Objective of Native Black Goat in Different Rearing Systems 1. The Performance of Traits and Cost-Profit Analysis. Iranian Journal of Animal Science. 41(2):163-171. ( In Persian)
  13. Wolfova M and Nitter G (2004) Relative economic weight of maternal versus direct traits in breeding schemes. Livest. Prod. Sci. 88:117–127.