Journal of Animal Production, Print ISSN: 2008-6776., Online ISSN: 2382-994X

Evaluating the economic impact of placement density and bedding material on productive performance in broiler chickens

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Majid Abbasi 1
Mohammad Reza Abedini 2
Seyed Naser Mousavi 2

1 Former M.Sc. Student, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture,Varamin-Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Animal Science, Facultyof Agriculture, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22059/jap.2019.263375.623307
Abstract
Effects of stocking density and the type of material used as litter on production performance and economic parameters of broilers were investigated by using 2,016 day-old Ross-308 broiler chicks in a 3×2 factorial arrangement with three levels of birds placement density [PD; 10 (control), 14, and 18 birds per square meter], and two types of bedding material [BM; wood shavings (control), and cardboard roll] based on a randomized complete block design with six treatments and four replications. The results showed that feed intake and weight gain of broilers with 10 birds density were significantly higher compared to 18, and 14 birds/m2 (P < 0.05). The feed conversion ratio of the birds that were raised on wood shavings was lower significantly in comparison with the birds grown on cardboard roll (P < 0.05). The highest values of economic indicators (benefit to cost ratio, and profit margin) were observed in PD 14 and then 18 birds/m2, both of which indicated a significant difference with the density of 10 birds/m2 (P < 0.01). Based on the results of current study, PD 14 birds/m2 in comparison with other PDs, by reducing the fixed costs of production, as well as numerical improvement in feed conversion can provide broiler farmers with more profit; moreover, cardboard roll with regard to its negative effect on feed efficiency cannot be used as an appropriate alternative for wood shavings.

Keywords

Benefit-cost ratio
Economic index
Growth
Production Management
productivity
Profit margin
  1. حسن‌آبادی ا و مهدی‌پور رابری م )1388( بررسی اثرات تراکم گله بر عملکرد، برخی از متابولیت‌های خون و شاخص‌های لاشه جوجه‌های گوشتی نر. پژوهش‌های علوم دامی. 1(2): 155-137.
    1. Atencio JL, Fernandez JA, Gernat AG and Murillo JG (2010) Effect of pin wood shavings, rice hulls and river bed sand on broiler productivity when used as a litter sources. International Journal of Poultry Science. 9(3): 240-243.
    2. Beg MAH, Baqui MA, Sarker NR and Hossain MM (2011) Effect of stocking density and feeding regime on performance of broiler chicken in summer season. International Journal of Poultry Science. 10(5): 365-375.
    3. Dozier III WA, Thaxton JP, Branton SL, Morgan GW, Miles DM, Roush WB, Lott BD and Vizzier-Thaxton Y (2005) Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poultry Science. 84: 1332-1338.
    4. El-Deek AA and Al-Harthi MA (2004) Responses of modern broiler chicks to stocking density, green tea, commercial multi enzymes and their interactions on productive performance, carcass characteristics, liver composition and plasma constituents. International Journal of Poultry Science. 3(10): 635-645.
    5. El-Deek AA, Al-Harthi MA, Khalifah MM, Elbanoby MM and Alharby T (2011) Impact of newspaper as bedding material in arid land on broiler performance. Egyptian Poultry Science. 31(4): 715-725.
    6. Feddes JJR, Emmanuel EJ and Zuidhof MJ (2002) Broiler performance, bodyweight variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poultry Science. 81: 774-779.
    7. Guardia S, Konsak B, Combes S, Levenez F, Cauquil L, Guillot JF, Moreau-Vauzelle C, Lessire M, Juin H and Gabriel I (2011) Effects of stocking density on the growth performance and digestive microbiota of broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 90: 1878-1889.
    8. Hetland H, Svihus B and Choct M (2005) Role of insoluble fiber on gizzard activity in layers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 14: 38-46.
    9. Huang Y, Yoo JS, Kim HJ, Wang Y, Chen YJ, Cho JH and Kim IH (2009) Effect of bedding types and different nutrient densities on growth performance, visceral organ weight, and blood characteristics in broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 18: 1-7.
    10. Imaeda N (2000) Influence of the stocking density and rearing season on incidence of sudden death syndrome in broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 79: 201-204.
    11. Lien RJ, Conner CO and Bilgili SF (1992) The use of recycled paper chips as litter material for rearing broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 71: 81-87.
    12. Mateos GG, Jiménez-Moreno E, Serrano MP and Lázaro RP (2012) Poultry response to high levels of dietary fiber sources varying in physical and chemical characteristics. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 21: 156-174.
    13. Nahashon SN, Adefope N and Wright D (2011) Effect of floor density on growth performance of Pearl Grey guinea fowl replacement pullets. Poultry Science. 90: 1371-1378.
    14. Onbasilar EE, Poyraz Ö, Erdem E and Öztürk H (2008) Influence of lighting periods and stocking densities on performance, carcass characteristics and some stress parameters in broilers. Archiv für Geflügelkunde. 72(5): 193-200.
    15. Santos FBO, Santos Jr AA, Ferket PR and Sheldon BW (2006) Influence of grain particle size and insoluble fiber content on Salmonella colonization and shedding of turkeys fed corn-soybean meal diets. International Journal of Poultry Science. 5(8): 731-739.
    16. Tulsian M (2014) Profitability Analysis (A comparative study of SAIL & TATA Steel). IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance. 3(2): 19-22.
    17. Villagrá A, Olivas I, Benitez V and Lainez M (2011) Evaluation of sludge from paper recycling as bedding material for broilers. Poultry Science. 90: 953-957.
    18. Wang XL, Zheng JX, Ning ZH, Qu LJ, Xu GY and Yang N (2009) Laying performance and egg quality of blue-shelled layers as affected by different housing systems. Poultry Science. 88: 1485-1492.

Journal of Animal Production, Print ISSN: 2008-6776., Online ISSN: 2382-994X
Volume 21, Issue 1
Spring 2019
Pages 61-71

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us