Mehrdad Shahizad; hamid Amanlou; Najme Eslamian Farsuni; Tahere Amirabadi Farahani; Hadi Khabazan
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Summer 2020, , Pages 349-356
Abstract
The objective of present study was to investigate the effect of different levels of sesame meal in early lactation cow's ration on dry matter intake, milkyield and composition, apparent digestibility of nutrients and blood metabolites. Six dairy lactating Holstein cows with average DIM 26± 3 (n=3primiparous ...
Read More
The objective of present study was to investigate the effect of different levels of sesame meal in early lactation cow's ration on dry matter intake, milkyield and composition, apparent digestibility of nutrients and blood metabolites. Six dairy lactating Holstein cows with average DIM 26± 3 (n=3primiparous and n=3 multiparous cows) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 experimental treatments (different levels of sesame meal) in repeated 3×3Latin square design. Experimental treatments were control (without sesame meal), 4.33% sesame meal and 8.66% sesame meal (DM basis). Theexperimental periods consisted of 21 d with the first 14 days as adaptation and the last 7 days as sampling days. Increasing level of sesame meal inearly lactation rations did not affect dry matter intake, milk yield and composition (fat, protein and lactose), feed utilization efficiency, apparentdigestibility of nutrients and blood metabolites (P 0.05), while milk urea nitrogen decreased with increasing the level of sesame meal (p < 0.05).Blood urea nitrogen concentrations also tended (P = 0.1) to decrease with increasing levels of sesame oil. In general, the lack of response in feedintake and milk yield with increasing the levels of sesame meal in early lactation cow's ration showed that sesame meal could be a proper proteinsource in early lactation cow's ration.
Hamid Amanlou; Hadi Shafiei; Tahereh Amirabadi Farahani; Farshid Kheiri; Najme Eslamian Farsuni
Volume 18, Issue 1 , Spring 2016, , Pages 27-38
Abstract
In order to compare the precision of predictions of NRC (2001) and CNCPS models, 17 Holstein fresh cows were assigned in a randomized complete block design to a balanced diet with NRC (2001) and CNCPS software. The predicted DMI, energy allowable milk and protein allowable milk by both models were compared ...
Read More
In order to compare the precision of predictions of NRC (2001) and CNCPS models, 17 Holstein fresh cows were assigned in a randomized complete block design to a balanced diet with NRC (2001) and CNCPS software. The predicted DMI, energy allowable milk and protein allowable milk by both models were compared with observed values. The precision of the predictions of models was evaluated by calculation of R2, mean bias and root mean square prediction error (RMSPE). Both models predicted DMI lower than the observed values (P<0.01). The mean bias, RMSPE and R2 were 2.22, 2.84 and 0.48 for NRC (2001) and 3.18, 3.99 and 0.52 for CNCPS, respectively and CNCPS predicted the DMI 20 percent lower than the observed value. The observed milk production was 29.78 kg/d. predicted energy allowable milk by NRC (2001) and CNCPS were 25.68 and 22.32 kg/d, respectively. Predicted protein allowable milk with NRC (2001) and CNCPS were 25.80 and 28.37 kg/d, respectively and NRC (2001) predicted the milk production 14 percent lower than observed value. Given the importance of DMI in fresh cows seems NRC (2001) has more precision compared to CNCPS for estimating nutritional requirements.